International officials demand privacy answers on Google Glass
2013-06-26 0:00

By Adario Strange | DVice

Red Ice Creations Note: As people become more aware than ever before about how much theyíre being spied upon by corporations, intelligence agencies, and the State, there is a new public hesitation towards popular technology that may further infringe on personal privacy. Lest we forget that GOOGLE ITSELF is embroiled in scandal as to its cooperation with National Security Agency to facilitate such spying.
Google is being quiet about the issue, but certainly not apologetic, as exemplified by former C.E.O. Eric Schmidtís infamous statement from 2010: ďIf you have something that you donít want anyone to know, maybe you shouldnít be doing it in the first place.Ē

The old íIf you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fearí fallacy.

But when it comes to privacy concerns, if only the mainstream was as adverse to the millions of CCTV cameras that litter the citiscapes of modern society; tracking our movements, recording our lives. How are they LESS invasive than Google Glass?
Arenít we simply habituated to them? Can the same habituation and acceptance happen with Google Glass?

As many point out, the Google Glass ífearí might be a little reactionary, as the tech is not any better at recording you than regular smart phones. However, because it has the potential to become ubiquitous, thereís the risk that our behaviour towards each other will change in reaction. And any technology that changes how we think, behave, and relate to one another will have ripple effects now, and far into the future.


International officials demand privacy answers on Google Glass

As if Google didnít already have enough to worry about regarding privacy concerns from the public, now a group of international officials have penned an open letter questioning the company on the privacy policies for Glass. Signed by data privacy officials from Canada, the European Union, Mexico, Israel, Switzerland, Australia, and New Zealand, the letter raises a number of questions regarding Glass, even though the device isnít scheduled to reach the public until next year.

The letter, addressed directly to CEO Larry Page, states: "we are writing to you as data protection authorities to raise questions from a privacy perspective about the development of Google GlassÖ Fears of ubiquitous surveillance of individuals by other individuals, whether through such recordings or through other applications currently being developed, have been raised." Later in the same message, the group also asks for the opportunity to meet with Google officials to test the device in-person. In a separate statement, Canadian privacy commissioner Jennifer Stoddart said, "Google Glass raises significant privacy issues and it is disappointing that Google has not engaged more meaningfully with data protection authorities about this technology."

This latest call for answers from Google regarding the privacy aspects of Glass comes right on the heels of an earlier high profile demand for answers from the U.S. congress last month. However, itís worth noting that even early access to Glass via the Explorer program is closed to non-U.S. residents, and the company hasnít shared a schedule for when it may or may not make Glass available internationally. Therefore, these early privacy concerns from the international community are a bit premature, but may hint that the global community believes Glass could become a mainstream hit.

Article from:

The Real Privacy Implications of Google Glass
By Jared Newman | TIME

Over the last few weeks, Google has steadily been building hype around Google Glass. The search giant revealed tech specs, explained how the software works, and has even let some of the tech press get their hands on the ďExplorer EditionĒ of the device, an early version that costs a cool $1,500.

One thing Google hasnít done is talk about the privacy implications of Glass, which has a built-in camera that can sneakily take photos and video at any time. It seems the company would rather let the debate play out on its own.

I think this is a mistake on Googleís part, but I also think much of the fearful prognosticating over Google Glass is misplaced. The real concern with Google Glass and privacy doesnít have to do with surveillance or collection of personal data, but with the way it will make us behave in the real world.

The Debate Thus Far

Google Glass supporters have a few standard lines of defense against privacy critics. They claim that Glass isnít much different than a smartphone in terms of capabilities, that people will have common decency about what to record, and that bystanders will learn to recognize when theyíre on camera.

Robert Scoble, arguably the biggest Glass advocate outside of Google, tries to swat down privacy complaints in a post on Google+:
They think weíre going to follow them into bathrooms and record ďtheir junk.Ē Ö If I wanted to do that Iíd rather use my new Android phone, which has a much better camera and, um, can be more easily aimed without grabbing attention. The microphone on my iPhone is better, too, and video is much sharper and isnít quite as wide angle, so I can see more details if Iím trying to be pervy anyway (which Iím not).

They think Iím going to walk by them recording everything they are saying. After getting [Glass] thatís laughable.

Scoble claims that the privacy concerns around Glass are overblown, and in a way, heís right. The vast majority of people arenít perverts or creeps, and wouldnít use Glass as a force of evil. Besides, the real stalkers already have better tools at their disposal.

But in making his defense, Scoble also touches on something more subtle. Because Glass opens the possibility of surreptitious recording, people will learn to put their guard up in the deviceís presence. Ever notice that people tweak their behavior when you train a camera on them? Glass has the potential to make that feeling the norm.

Tim Stevens, in his review of the Glass Explorer Edition at Engadget, captures this notion perfectly:
The point can certainly be made that itís possible to take a picture or video of someone these days without their knowledge, but the situation here is a bit reversed: nobody knows if youíre not taking a picture or video of them. This will, at first, result in some good-natured ďAre you recording this?Ē comments in conversations but, as time goes on, as a wearer, youíll notice that people will be acting a little more cautiously around you. (As an aside, theyíll also struggle to maintain eye contact. One person told us that Glass looked like a ďthird eyeĒ that he couldnít stop staring at.)

Google Glass may expose us to prying eyes, but that risk already applies to existing technology, as Scoble pointed out. As for data collection, Google already knows plenty about its users through Gmail, Maps and Search. The only major new frontier for Glass is face recognition, but itís a stretch to assume that Glass would start auto-tagging everyone it sees and building some secret mugshot database.

If thereís one thing we should really worry about, itís that weíll treat each other differently, and trust each other less, when Glass is around. (A related argument from Edward Champion is that the Glass will discourage personal risk.)

Weíre already expected to behave this way online. On social networks, the general rule is that you should always assume anything could become public. While most of us will never have to deal with a scandal caused by information leaked from social media, the mere possibility is enough for us to watch what we say on social networks. Google Glass has the potential to bring that kind of guarded approach to the real world, even in private settings.


Read the full article at:

READ: Thirty-Five Arguments Against Google Glass

Related Articles
Software that tracks your every move and predicts future behavior
Dozens of high-tech cameras programmed to watch for ísuspicious behaviorí during Republican National Convention
Facebook Spies On Chats For Suspicious Behavior
Nothing to Hide, Nothing to Fear
Why Privacy Matters Even if You Have íNothing to Hideí
Privacy Is Not Secrecy; Debunking The íIf Youíve Got Nothing To Hide...í Argument
Google Glass: Let the evil commence
A look at the darker side of Google Glass
The Banning of Google Glass Begins (And They Arenít Even Available Yet)
Google Glass can identify people by their clothing
Google Glass: Augmenting Minds or Helping Us Sleepwalk?

Latest News from our Front Page

Sweden to give over 8 million euros to Turkey for "refugee deal" - Europe to give three billion euros total
2015-12-01 1:44
Prime Minister Stefan Löfven announced on Sunday that Sweden would contribute to a joint action plan agreed by nine EU nations designed to limit the number of refugees arriving in Europe via Turkey. The deal came after the German Chancellor Angela Merkel held a surprise summit in Brussels involving the leaders of nine countries including Sweden, France and the UK. The European ...
Swedish woman raped by "refugee" refuses to report it because she feels sorry for him
2015-12-01 0:12
Victim sympathized with rapist's "difficult situation" A Swedish woman who was raped by an Iraqi ‚Äúrefugee‚ÄĚ on a train initially refused to report the incident to police because she ‚Äėfelt sorry‚Äô for her attacker. The incident occurred on a night train between Ume√• and Sundsvall back in October. The Iraqi refugee was traveling back to Sweden because he was unhappy with the ...
ISIS Oil Trade Full Frontal: "Raqqa's Rockefellers," Bilal Erdogan, KRG Crude, And The Israel Connection
2015-11-30 21:56
"Effectively, we have been financially discriminated against for a long time. By early 2014, when we did not receive the budget, we decided we need to start thinking about independent oil sales‚ÄĚ --  Ashti Hawrami, Kurdistan‚Äôs minister for natural resources In June of 2014, the SCF Altai (an oil tanker) arrived at Ashkelon port. Hours later, the first shipment of Kurdish ...
Prosecutors ban Soros Foundation as 'threat to Russian national security'
2015-11-30 21:04
The Russian Prosecutor General’s Office has recognized George Soros’s Open Society Institute and another affiliated organization as undesirable groups, banning Russian citizens and organizations from participation in any of their projects. In a statement released on Monday, prosecutors said the activities of the Open Society Institute and the Open Society Institute Assistance Foundation were a threat to the foundations of Russia’s ...
Israeli Colonel Caught with Islamic State (IS) Pants Down
2015-11-30 21:11
This was definitely not supposed to happen. It seems that an Israeli military man with the rank of colonel was ‚Äúcaught with IS pants down.‚ÄĚ By that I mean he was captured amid a gaggle of so-called IS‚Äďor Islamic State or ISIS or DAESH depending on your preference‚Äďterrorists, by soldiers of the Iraqi army. Under interrogation by the Iraqi intelligence ...
More News »