Solar Scientist Give Global Warming Fanatics a Black Eye
2005 05 03
by Mitch Battros | EarthChangesTV.com
Yet another research article as part of a continuing flow of information which calls the environmental zealots out on the carpet, shows yet again how much influence solar particles have on our home.
The global warming regime tried to use the very same formula the Bush regime used with Iraq. Create an ‘evil doer’, demonize and create false scenarios, scare the public, then come forward as the ‘white knight’ to save the day, but with a martyrs slant.
Instead of Saddam Hussein (evil doer), we have human polluters (evil doers). Instead of Weapons of Mass Destruction, we have Global Warming. Instead of the (mushroom cloud), we have the burning off of the ozone layer.
Now lets take a closer look
Just as Saddam Hussein had nothing to do with 9-11, so is the case with pollution. For those who have been following my reports over the years know quite well I am all for “clean air and water”. I have no doubt I do more for the environment than 70% of our viewers. But this has nothing to do with “weather or climate”. In the same manner, it was mostly unanimous among the world community that Saddam Hussein is a bad person and is better off not leading any country. Of course the same could be said for Bubba Bush, but that’s beside the point. The point being, the removal of Saddam Hussein has no effect on the stopping of terrorism, or in any way stop another 9-11.
If we passed a law tomorrow for arresting all polluters and placing them in jail, it would have no measurable effect on weather or climate change. Sure, we would be better off having clean air and water, I’m all for that, just like the world is better off with Hussein in jail, but in either case it has no measurable effect on the causal outcome.
James Hansen is the Bubba Bush of global warming. It was Hansen who in 1988 came up with this made up word “global warming”. And what was it based on? The same wrong, disingenuous, and out right lies just as the report on weapons of mass destruction. In simple terms…made up data to show cause for a agenda driven plan of action. It was a false string of manipulated data for the purpose of convincing a naive public to take action. In other words…you were scammed!
Do you think the Bush regime will use the same tactics with Iran; to hood-wink the public and the world? Well they did send up a test balloon (testing the will of the people), but it was shot down in rapid fire. So the answer is not a chance. This is what we are now seeing in the scientific community. First the environmentalist gained a strong foot hold, spreading their babble about weapons of mass destruction, whoops, I mean theories of global warming. But science has caught up to them, just as the American people have caught up to Bush (lowest support ratings ever).
Now lets take a look at the latest research
(NASA/JPL) “Researchers concluded the record ozone declines were the result of a combination of unusual stratospheric weather conditions and energetic solar particles in the atmosphere resulting from the vigorous solar storm activity. Results of the study appear in the online version of the American Geophysical Union journal Geophysical Research Letters.”
Solar storms, such as the unusually intense events in October and November 2003, affect many aspects of our lives, such as radio signals and satellite communications. Now a new study partially funded by NASA and using data from several NASA instruments has shown that those late 2003 solar storms, which deposited huge quantities of energetic solar particles into Earth's atmosphere, combined forces with another natural atmospheric process last spring to produce the largest decline ever recorded in upper stratospheric ozone over the Arctic and the northern areas of North America, Europe and Asia.
Last spring following a warm Arctic winter, scientists were surprised to see record levels of ozone loss in the upper, not lower, stratosphere; reductions in ozone levels of up to 60 percent about 40 kilometers (25 miles) above Earth's high northern latitudes. This unusual ozone destruction resulted from processes distinctly different from the more commonly observed lower stratospheric ozone loss caused by chemical reactions with chlorofluorocarbons. This time the culprits were high levels of nitrogen oxide and nitrogen dioxide, two gases that together destroy stratospheric ozone. An international team of scientists from the United States, Canada and Europe, including researchers from NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif., and L! angley Research Center, Hampton, Va., set out to uncover the processes behind the unexpected ozone loss.
Using data from seven satellites, including NASA's Stratospheric Aerosol and Gas Experiment II and III instruments on the Earth Radiation Budget Satellite and the Halogen Occultation Experiment on NASA's Upper Atmospheric Research Satellite, the researchers concluded the record ozone declines were the result of a combination of unusual stratospheric weather conditions and energetic solar particles in the atmosphere resulting from the vigorous solar storm activity. Results of the study appear in the online version of the American Geophysical Union journal Geophysical Research Letters.
In February and March 2004, winds in the upper stratospheric polar vortex sped up to their strongest levels on record. The vortex allowed the nitrogen gases, which are believed to have formed at least 10 kilometers (6 miles) above the stratosphere as a result of chemical reactions triggered by energetic solar particles, to descend more easily than normal into the stratosphere."
Study lead author Dr. Cora Randall of the University of Colorado at Boulder's Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics said the phenomenon illustrates the difficulties in separating ozone-destroying atmospheric effects resulting from natural versus human-induced causes. "These findings point out a critical need to better understand the processes occurring in the ozone layer, and demonstrate that scientists searching for signs of ozone recovery need to factor in the atmospheric effects of energetic particles, something they do not now do," she said.
Article From: EarthChangesTV.com - Newsletter