We are looking for Europeans of different nationalities that can speak about the refugee invasion in your country and how this REALLY is affecting you. Are you in Hungary, Greece, Germany, France, Italy, Austria or another country being heavily invaded? Please reach out: views@redicecreations.com or @rediceradio We want to speak with you!

The FBI and the Myth of the Fingerprint
2013-08-16 0:00

By Jeffrey St. Clair and Alexander Cockburn | CounterPunch

The real crime is in the crime lab

Few law enforcement institutions have been so thoroughly discredited as the FBI’s forensic lab. In 1997 the Bureau’s inspector general of the time issued a devastating report, stigmatizing one instance after another of mishandled and contaminated evidence, inept technicians, and outright fabrication. The IG concluded that there were “serious and credible allegations of incompetence” and perjured courtroom testimony.

Our view is that taken as a whole, forensic evidence as used by prosecutors is inherently untrustworthy. For example, for years many people went to prison on the basis of the claims of a North Carolina anthropologist, Louise Robbins. She helped send people to prison or to Death Row with her self-proclaimed power to identify criminals through shoe prints. As an excellent recent Chicago Tribune series on forensic humbug recalled, on occasion she even said she could use the method to determine a person’s height, sex and race. Robbins died in 1987, her legacy compromised by the conclusion of many Appeals Courts that her methodology was bosh. There have been similarly hollow claims for lip prints and ear prints, all of them invoked by their supporters as “100 per cent reliable” and believed by juries too easily impressed by passionate invocations to 100 percent reliable scientific data.

Of course the apex forensic hero of prosecutors, long promoted as the bottom line in reliability–at least until the arrival of DNA matching–has been the fingerprint.

Fingerprints entered the arsenal of police and prosecutors in the late nineteenth century, touted as “scientific” in the manner of other fashionable methods of that time in the identification of supposed criminals, such as phrenology. A prime salesman was Francis Galton, Charles Darwin’s cousin and a founding huckster for the bogus “science” of eugenics. Actually fingerprints, at least in modern times, found their original use in the efforts of a British colonial administrator to intimidate his Indian laborers (whose faces he could not distinguish) from turning up more than once to get paid. He’d make a great show of scrutinizing the fingerprints he insisted they daub on his ledger book.

Then, as now, the use of the so-called “unique fingerprint” has been histrionic, not exactly scientific. In 1995, so the Chicago Tribune series discovered, “one of the only independent proficiency tests of fingerprint examiners in U.S. crime labs found that nearly a quarter reported false positives, meaning they declared prints identical even though they were not–the sort of mistakes that can lead to wrongful convictions or arrests.”

Decade after decade people have been sent to prison for years or dispatched to the death cell, solely on the basis of a single, even a partial print. So great is the resonance of the phrase “a perfect match” that defense lawyers throw in the towel, as judge and jury listen to the assured conclusions of the FBI’s analysts who virtually monopolize the fingerprint industry in the U.S.A. Overseas, in London’s Scotland Yard for example, the same mesmerizing “certainty” held sway, and still does.

In the U.S.A., part of the mystique stems from the “one discrepancy rule” which has supposedly governed the FBI’s fingerprint analysis. The rule says that identifications are subject to a standard of “100 per cent certainty” where a single difference in appearance is supposed to preclude identification.

The 1997 lab scandals threw a shadow over the FBI’s forensic procedures as a whole and the criminal defense bar began to raise protests against prosecutorial use of latent fingerprint identification evidence, as produced by FBI procedures. In 2002 Judge Louis Pollak, presiding over in a case in Pennsylvania, initially ruled that the FBI’s fingerprint matching criteria fell below new standards of forensic reliability (the Daubert Standards) stipulated by the Supreme Court. Ultimately the judge was persuaded that the FBI’s fingerprint lab had never made a mistake.


Read the full article at: counterpunch.org

SEE: The Innocence Project

Related Articles
FBI Admits to Flying Drones Over US Without Warrants
Calls for New Investigations into the FBI Todashev Killing
Homeland Security chair: FBI not cooperating with Boston Bombing Probe
Hours Before His Death Michael Hastings Contacted Wikileaks Attorney Said FBI Was Investigating Him
Again!? FBI foils supposed "planned terror attack"
Did the FBI Just Bungle The Boston Bomb Plot, or Did It Actually Create It?
FBI’s History of Handing "Terror Suspects" Live Explosives
Revisit: The FBI Allowed the 1993 WTC Bombing to Happen
California prisons sterilized female inmates without permission
Thanks to For-Profit Prisons, Louisiana Has Triple the Incarceration Rate of Iran
The Prison Industrial Complex
Apple’s new iPhone may have fingerprint sensor - Biometric Kit
Biometric Database of All Adult Americans Hidden in Immigration Reform
NYPD begins biometric iris scans upon arrest

Latest News from our Front Page

EU Must Get Ready: UN Predicts 1.4 MILLION Migrants to Arrive in Next Two Years
2015-10-04 3:05
Comment: The UN know and encourage these kinds of numbers to come into Europe, see comment below the article for more. The UN refugee agency (UNHCR) announced that it expects 700,000 migrants and refugees to reach Europe via the Mediterranean this year and predicted at least the same amount again in 2016. A spokesman for UNHCR Adrian Edwards confirmed that the figures ...
Oops: Did CNN Just Admit the U.S. Is Working with ISIS? & The ISIS Conspiracy
2015-10-04 1:33
Because we wouldn't want Russia to have an accidental skirmish with the U.S.-led ISIS coalition, now would we? Source: youtube.com The ISIS Conspiracy By Brandon Martinez The ISIS Conspiracy is a video series created by independent journalist and writer Brandon Martinez and is based on his book The ISIS Conspiracy: How Israel and the West Manipulate Our Minds Through Fear. In Part I Martinez ...
Sydney: Activists deliver petition to send refugees to PM's electorate
2015-10-04 0:19
Police confronted activists concerned with plans to resettle 12,000 Syrian refugees in Australia during a political stunt staged outside the house of Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull in Sydney on September 27, 2015. Watch the video here: Sydney: PM urged to resettle Muslim refugees in eastern suburbs Members of the right-wing Party For Freedom delivered a petition urging the PM to resettle the ...
Umpqua Shooter Harper-Mercer Left Note: Wanted to “Be Embraced By the Devil” and “Welcomed in Hell”
2015-10-03 23:56
Has the media come out against left-hand path occultists who worship the devil yet? No, they continue to blame gun toting conservative "White-supremacists" for this one. Umpqua Shooter was identified as Chris Harper Mercer last night. Chris Mercer killed 9 people before being shot by police. Chris Harper Mercer was an atheist. (MySpace Image) The profile contains several Irish Revolutionary Army images ...
Jews In America Demand Washington Admit More Syrian “Refugees”
2015-10-03 23:09
In what is becoming a re-occurring theme here on this website, the organized Jewish community in America is once again openly and self-righteously demanding the United States accept as “refugees” even more unskilled, uneducated, backwards people who have no ties to or affinity towards this country and its traditions. As noted here recently, the organized international Jewish community, countless Jewish charities ...
More News »