Conscious Capitalism
2013 07 05

From: Organic Connections

In some quar­ters of the com­pet­i­tive busi­ness world, Raj Sisodia’s ideas are prob­a­bly viewed as rad­i­cal or, at best, severely lim­it­ing. Yet this award-winning author, pro­fes­sor and eco­nomic con­sul­tant is, in actu­al­ity, view­ing the busi­ness world in the only way it can be viewed if we are to sur­vive as a cul­ture and as a planet. In his new book Conscious Capitalism: Liberating the Heroic Spirit of Business, co-authored with Whole Foods Market co-CEO John Mackey, Sisodia describes com­pa­nies con­duct­ing them­selves with a higher pur­pose, con­scious lead­er­ship, and an eye to the impact of the com­pany on cus­tomers, employ­ees, the envi­ron­ment and soci­ety in gen­eral. An ever-growing num­ber of com­pa­nies and cor­po­ra­tions are listening.

[...]

The eco­nomic mar­ket model of today was actu­ally set in place back in 1776, with the pub­li­ca­tion of a work called An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. The book’s author, Scotsman Adam Smith, is today viewed as the father of mod­ern economics—and Sisodia sees one vital ele­ment miss­ing from his philosophy.

“Adam Smith’s core mes­sage was really that cen­tral­ized plan­ning doesn’t work,” Sisodia pointed out. “You can’t have gov­ern­ment bureau­crats fig­ur­ing out who should make what and how much and what to price it at. He said that indi­vid­u­als make those deci­sions based on their own per­ceived self-interest; but that is far supe­rior to hav­ing some­body sit­ting some­where try­ing to decide all of that, because it essen­tially can­not be done.

“However, what did not hap­pen was the other side of our human per­sona, which is the need to care; it is equally as pow­er­ful as the drive for self-interest. When it came to estab­lish­ing the foun­da­tions of cap­i­tal­ism, peo­ple ignored this dimen­sion, assum­ing that this is some­thing you do out­side of the con­text of work, that you ful­fill your need to care through your fam­ily and through your com­mu­nity, and that busi­ness can only be about self-interest.

“That’s like going into the world of busi­ness with half of your brain or per­sona shut off, the more human half. I think we should have inte­grated those two dimensions—the human need to care with the human drive for self-interest—into the same activ­ity of busi­ness. It would have cre­ated a foun­da­tion for cap­i­tal­ism that was much richer than what we ended up with.”

[...]

Change Must Come

“Today what we talk about as Conscious Capitalism and con­scious busi­ness is really the excep­tion,” Sisodia con­cluded. “The norm is busi­ness done with the view to max­i­mize prof­its for share­hold­ers. That is not even ques­tioned. It is gospel in busi­ness school and gospel in many com­pa­nies, espe­cially pub­licly traded com­pa­nies. We’re seen as a sort of alter­na­tive approach.

“We want to get to a point where the default becomes the good option, where this becomes the norm, where peo­ple say, ‘Well, of course busi­ness has to start with pur­pose.’ I taught busi­ness for twenty-five years and never used the word pur­pose, because the pur­pose was given to us: it’s to max­i­mize profit; okay, move on. Now we are say­ing, ‘That’s not enough.’ Profit is the out­come of doing a busi­ness well; profit can never be the pur­pose. If it does become the pur­pose, that busi­ness is headed down­hill in a hurry.

“Right now we have a very toxic nar­ra­tive about busi­ness and cap­i­tal­ism that is based upon greed, exploita­tion and self­ish­ness. It is about enrich­ing the few at the expense of the many.

“The real nar­ra­tive about busi­ness is that busi­ness, when it’s done right, is fun­da­men­tally good. It’s based in value cre­ation. It’s fun­da­men­tally eth­i­cal because it’s based on vol­un­tary exchange, and it is noble because it ele­vates our exis­tence above the level of sub­sis­tence where we can explore what it means to be human. It’s heroic because it lifts peo­ple out of poverty; it enables life to actu­ally flour­ish on this planet.

“It should be this way so that the most ide­al­is­tic of our young peo­ple would not auto­mat­i­cally shun the world of busi­ness, say­ing, ‘If I am ide­al­is­tic I can’t have any­thing to do with busi­ness.’ They would rec­og­nize that busi­ness actu­ally is the way for effect­ing change in soci­ety on a broader scale, in a more sus­tain­able way than work­ing strictly for prof­its.”

Read the full article at: organicconnectmag.com



Related Articles
Government in Business - Murray Rothbard
Profits Before Nutrition: The Dark Side of the School Meals Business
The Market Has Spoken: Austerity Is Bad for Business
Student Loans: The Government is Now Officially in the Banking Business


Latest News from our Front Page

Recent Israeli Synagogue Attack, a Possible False Flag?
2014 11 21
Dear Friends - I woke up yesterday morning to see a newspaper lying on the kitchen table with the front page proclaiming that five people were slain in an Israeli synagogue after a so-called "Palestinian attack." Some members of the media said that four people were killed, others said five, so it seems like that there was some confusion (or ...
The Michael Brown Shooting, Race Baiting for Political Power and Militarization of the Police
2014 11 21
From Youtube: The evidence clearly shows that Officer Darren Wilson was justified in shooting Michael Brown, so why is this case being hyped by the mainstream media and the leftist political establishment?
Detekt: A New Malware Detection Tool That Can Expose Illegitimate State Surveillance
2014 11 21
Recent years have seen a boom in the adoption of surveillance technology by governments around the world, including spyware that provides its purchasers the unchecked ability to target remote Internet users’ computers, to read their personal emails, listen in on private audio calls, record keystrokes and passwords, and remotely activate their computer’s camera or microphone. EFF, together with Amnesty International, ...
New UK spy chief says tech giants aid terrorism, privacy not ‘absolute right’
2014 11 21
Robert Hannigan, the new head of GCHQ The new head of Britain’s GCHQ, the UK equivalent of the NSA in the U.S., said he believes privacy is not an absolute right and that tech giants must open themselves up to intelligence agencies. “GCHQ is happy to be part of a mature debate on privacy in the digital age,” Hannigan said. “But privacy ...
LOL: Atheist Feminist Pornographer Used as Moral Authority in T-shirt Row
2014 11 21
Dr. Matt Taylor was thrust into the headlines this last week, largely for his lead role in successfully landing a spacecraft on a comet 300 million miles from earth that travels at a speed of 85,000 mph. In short, Taylor and his colleagues pulled off one of the most amazing achievements in contemporary science and space exploration, and in a ...
More News »