Woolwich ’Terror’ Reigniting the Fire
By Tom Secker | Investigating The Terror
The recent murder of British soldier Lee Rigby in Woolwich has reignited the fire of the ’war on terror’ in Britain. Initial, inaccurate reports said that the victim was beheaded with a machete by a man shouting ’Allah Akbar’ and this started a media firestorm. Within hours the killing was labelled as terrorism and the upper echelons of government went through the absurd ritual of two COBRA meetings. Now that the initial wave of fear-filled nonsense has passed, we are in a position to ask some serious questions.
This was the first meaningful act of ’terrorism’ in Britain since the 7/7 bombings of 2005. On 21/7, two weeks after 7/7, the ’bombers’ had no bombs, no viable explosive devices, and despite the cut-throat defence of Manfo Asiedu (not his real name) the idea that these were failed suicide bombings is flimsy at best. Two years later, just after the jury had retired to consider their verdict in the trial of the 21/7 accused, two men drove a Jeep Cherokee into a bollard at Glasgow airport having set themselves on fire. No members of the public were injured, the only person who died in the attack was one of the culprits, and a little over a week later the jury in the 21/7 trial found four of the accused guilty. They couldn’t come to a verdict on Asiedu and he later pleaded guilty to diminished charges. In the Glasgow airport incident the second man in the jeep was convicted of conspiracy to murder but several others who were arrested were all found not guilty or had the charges against them dropped.
The following year, in May 2008 a young white man who had converted to Islam named Nicky Reilly tried to blow himself up in Exeter. He accidentally detonated his bomb in the toilets of a restaurant, managing only to injure himself and scare a few people. He pleaded guilty and received a life sentence. Reilly was a social misfit with a low IQ, learning difficulties, who suffered from Aspergers Syndrome and had spent some time in a mental health facility. As such he was extremely susceptible to manipulation, as his mother put it, ’he would have had to have instructions or guidance from someone, there’s no way Nicky’s got the capability to do that.’ Several other people who were arrested as part of the investigation were all released and no provocateur or mastermind, either Islamic or otherwise, has ever been found.
Since then, the treadmill of arrests of Muslims and occasionally others has continued, as has the mission creep of the security services as seen in the run up to the Olympic games in London, but there has been no ’terrorist’ violence in mainland Britain, until Woolwich. This perhaps explains why the government were so quick to call this incident a terrorist attack, because the great threatening menace of radical Islamic terror has, since 7/7, added up to a bunch of fools who were more dangerous to themselves than to anyone else. Two Nigerian men who killed a soldier by driving over him and then hacking him to death, one of whom was filmed after the deed with bloody hands shouting radical statements, fit the bill very nicely.
Echoes of Past Blowback
If we are to take Michael Adebolajo’s statements at face value, his motive for killing Lee Rigby was as a backlash against or revenge for the violence perpetrated by NATO in Muslim lands. He said:
The only reason we have killed this man today is because Muslims are dying daily by British soldiers. And this British soldier is one. ... By Allah, we swear by the almighty Allah we will never stop fighting you until you leave us alone. So what if we want to live by the Sharia in Muslim lands? Why does that mean you must follow us and chase us and call us extremists and kill us? ... When you drop a bomb do you think it hits one person? Or rather your bomb wipes out a whole family? ... Through [many passages in the] Koran we must fight them as they fight us. ... I apologise that women had to witness this today but in our lands women have to see the same. You people will never be safe. Remove your governments, they don’t care about you. You think David Cameron is going to get caught in the street when we start busting our guns? You think politicians are going to die? No, it’s going to be the average guy, like you and your children. So get rid of them. Tell them to bring our troops back so we can, so you can all live in peace.
This has led many commentators to categorise the attack as blowback, the unintended but utterly predictable consequence of covert or overt military operations. Indeed, many of Adebolajo’s claims and exhortations, such as that our governments in the West don’t care about us and that we should get rid of them, are quite widespread beliefs and sentiments. Withdrawing troops from the many countries they occupy would likely be the most popular policy in NATO’s history, both domestically and globally. The critical difference is that Adebolajo seems to have turned such ideas into the justification for murder. As much as there is reason to be sceptical of the ’blowback’ category of terrorist events, particularly when it is applied to 9/11 and 7/7, in this instance it may well be the most accurate way to interpret the event.
In such a context we must wonder, did MI5 and the rest of the British security state know about Adebolajo’s increasing radicalism, his mistreatment in Kenya, his propensity for violence? Did they allow the attack to happen? Were the intelligence ’failures’ actually successes? Just as Al Muhajiroun has created terror suspects for the domestic market and radical militants for the overseas market, does it also manufacture the occasional genuinely dangerous handful of people to be deployed on Britain’s streets?
Read the full article at: investigatingtheterror.com
Woolwich murder: Younger brother of Michael Adebolajo ‘was paid thousands to spy in Middle East’ by MI6
The Woolwich Witch Hunt and Psychological Inclosure Act of 2013
Britain’s MI5 Connection to Woolwich Slasher Michael Adebolajo
Latest News from our Front Page
The Truth About Starbucks New Coconut Milk: It Isn’t Really Coconut Milk
In an attempt to appeal to the non-dairy crowd, Starbucks is bringing “coconut milk” to the masses. After a successful trial run in select cities at the behest of their customers, Starbucks has decided to push forward with their dairy alternative.
Providing a non-dairy alternative to dairy and soy is the second most requested customer idea of all time from MyStarbucksIdea.com, ...
USDA on board with shipping U.S. chickens to China for processing, then re-entry to States for human consumption
“Chinese chicken” will soon have a whole new meaning, as the U.S. Department of Agriculture recently gave the green-light to four chicken processing plants in China, allowing chicken raised and slaughtered in the U.S. to be exported to China for processing, and then shipped back to the U.S. and sold on grocery shelves here. Furthermore, the imported processed ...
Feinstein: Netanyahu does not speak for all Jews
US Senator Dianne Feinstein, chair of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, has denounced Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as an “arrogant” man who does not speak for all Jews.
The Jewish lawmaker made the remarks in an interview with CNN on Sunday ahead of Netanyahu's controversial visit to the United States.
The Israeli premier arrived in Washington, DC, on Sunday night ...
Netanyahu to US: Don’t negotiate ‘bad deal’ with Iran
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has called on the United States not to negotiate “a very bad deal” with Iran over its nuclear energy program.
Speaking at a joint session of the US Congress in Washington, DC, on Tuesday, Netanyahu said, “We’ve been told for over a year that no deal is better than a bad deal. Well this is a ...
School Textbook: “There’s No Such Thing as Reverse Racism” Only White People can be Racist
Only white people can be racist.
A school textbook teaches students that “there is no such thing as reverse racism” and that women can never be as sexist as men.
The passage, which appears to be taken from a “multicultural education series” book entitled Is Everyone Equal, states, “STOP: There is no such thing as reverse racism or reverse sexism (or the ...
|More News » |