Noam Chomsky: Obamaís Attack on Civil Liberties Has Gone Way Beyond Imagination
2013 05 01

By Mike Stivers | AlterNet

Under Obamaís administration, if you meet with someone in a terrorist group and advise them to turn to nonviolent means, then thatís material assistance to terrorism.

Mike Stivers: Anyone following issues of civil liberties under Obama knows that his administrationís policies have been disastrous. The signing of the 2012 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which effectively legalizes indefinite detention of US citizens, the prosecution of more whistleblowers than any previous president, the refusal to close Guantanamo, and the adoption of ruthless positions in trials such as Hedges vs. Obama and Holder vs. Humanitarian Law Project donít even encapsulate the full extent of the flagrant violations of civil, political and constitutional rights. One basic question that a lot of people seem to be asking is, why? Whatís the rationale?


Noam Chomsky: Thatís a very interesting question. I personally never expected anything of Obama, and wrote about it before the 2008 primaries. I thought it was smoke and mirrors. The one thing that did surprise me is his attack on civil liberties. They go well beyond anything I would have anticipated, and they donít seem easy to explain. In many ways the worst is what you mention,  Holder vs. Humanitarian Law Project. Thatís an Obama initiative and itís a very serious attack on civil liberties. He doesnít gain anything from it Ė he doesnít get any political mileage out of it. In fact, most people donít even know about it, but what it does is extend the concept of "material assistance to terror" to speech.


The case in question was a law group that was giving legal advice to groups on the terrorist list, which in itself has no moral or legal justification; itís an abomination. But if you look at the way itís been used, it becomes even more abhorrent ( Nelson Mandela was on it until a couple of years ago.) And the wording of the colloquy is broad enough that it could very well mean that if, say, you meet with someone in a terrorist group and advise them to turn to nonviolent means, then thatís material assistance to terrorism. Iíve met with people who are on the list and will continue to do so, and Obama wants to criminalize that, which is a plain attack on freedom of speech. I just donít understand why heís doing it.


The NDAA suit, of which Iím a plaintiff - it mostly codifies existing practice. While there has been some protest over the indefinite detention clause, thereís one aspect of it that Iím not entirely happy with. The only protest thatís being raised is in response to detention of American citizens, but I donít see why we should have the right to detain anyone without trial. The provision of the NDAA that allows for this should not be tolerated. It was banned almost eight centuries ago in the Magna Carta.


Itís the same with the drone killings. There was some protest over the Anwar Al-Awlaki killing because he was an American citizen. But what about someone who isnít an American citizen? Do we have a right to murder them if the president feels like it?



[...]

Read the full article at: alternet.org

Related: Noam Chomsky - Controlled Asset Of The New World Order




Tune into Red Ice Radio:

Dan Johnson - Hour 1 - People Against the National Defense Authorization Act

John B. Wells - Hour 1 - The Police State

Charles Farrier - No CCTV, Campaign Against Big Brother Camera Surveillance

Gregory Sams - Chaos Theory, The State is Out of Date & Bottom Up Organization

Brian Gerrish - Common Purpose & Neuro Linguistic Programming

Radio 3Fourteen - Mike Seibert - Asset Forfeiture, Endangered Rights & Judicial Tyranny



Related Articles
Living Under Drones
Obama cries, yet dismisses the ďcollateral casualtiesĒ of drone warfare
Drone Carnage, Children Slaughtered: The Moral Question Obama Canít Evade
"Whatever Is Left Is Just Pieces of Bodies and Cloth": The Horror of Living Under Drones
Big Brother, Kill Lists, and Secrecy: What to Expect from Obamaís Second Term
"Disposition Matrix": Presidentís 10-Year Plan for the Kill List


Latest News from our Front Page

ACLU Sues Ferguson School District For Having Too Many White People
2014-12-23 20:09
The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) filed a lawsuit on behalf of the NAACP against the school district that represents Ferguson, MO. The lawsuit more or less states that thereís just too damn many white people, not just on the school board, but in the voting district as well. It is a legal challenge to democracy brought forth by an ...
Sony approves limited US release of The Interview on Christmas Day - Big Surprise, as this was all marketing
2014-12-23 20:39
Sony get's the best possible marketing. Move comes after Obama said Sony had Ďmade a mistakeí pulling the movie following a campaign to kill film the White House believes was organised by North Korea Controversial comedy The Interview will be released on Christmas Day, reversing an earlier move by Sony to pull the film following a massive hack of the studio. Sony held ...
"French" knife attacker Bertrand Nzohabonayo was Islamic convert
2014-12-23 19:50
When Islam came to France - A love story Bertrand Nzohabonayo, another unarmed black man viciously killed by cops because he was only attacking French people with a knife while shouting "Allahu Akbar.Ē Man shot dead by French police had changed name to Bilal and posted Isil flag on Facebook. French police investigating a young man shot dead after he attacked officers with ...
Man shouting 'Allahu Akbar' drives into crowd in France
2014-12-23 19:30
Welcome to the new "vibrant" France A policewoman collects evidence in Dijon on the site where a driver shouting "Allahu Akbar" ("God is great") ploughed into a crowd injuring 11 people Eleven people injured after driver targets crowds in Dijon a day after recent convert to Islam is shot dead during knife attack. A driver shouted "Allahu Akbar" ("God is greatest") as he ...
BjŲrn SŲder, Swedish Jews, and Multiculturalism
2014-12-23 2:12
Of all the accusations commonly leveled against a Jews as a group, perhaps the one they find most frightening is the accusation that they are disloyal, or arenít Ďquiteí like the rest of us. Arguably, a large part of the Jewish evolutionary strategy consists of maintaining a pose, or pretence, to be fully in and of the nation and its ...
More News Ľ