Noam Chomsky: Obamaís Attack on Civil Liberties Has Gone Way Beyond Imagination
2013-05-01 0:00

By Mike Stivers | AlterNet

Under Obamaís administration, if you meet with someone in a terrorist group and advise them to turn to nonviolent means, then thatís material assistance to terrorism.

Mike Stivers: Anyone following issues of civil liberties under Obama knows that his administrationís policies have been disastrous. The signing of the 2012 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which effectively legalizes indefinite detention of US citizens, the prosecution of more whistleblowers than any previous president, the refusal to close Guantanamo, and the adoption of ruthless positions in trials such as Hedges vs. Obama and Holder vs. Humanitarian Law Project donít even encapsulate the full extent of the flagrant violations of civil, political and constitutional rights. One basic question that a lot of people seem to be asking is, why? Whatís the rationale?


Noam Chomsky: Thatís a very interesting question. I personally never expected anything of Obama, and wrote about it before the 2008 primaries. I thought it was smoke and mirrors. The one thing that did surprise me is his attack on civil liberties. They go well beyond anything I would have anticipated, and they donít seem easy to explain. In many ways the worst is what you mention,  Holder vs. Humanitarian Law Project. Thatís an Obama initiative and itís a very serious attack on civil liberties. He doesnít gain anything from it Ė he doesnít get any political mileage out of it. In fact, most people donít even know about it, but what it does is extend the concept of "material assistance to terror" to speech.


The case in question was a law group that was giving legal advice to groups on the terrorist list, which in itself has no moral or legal justification; itís an abomination. But if you look at the way itís been used, it becomes even more abhorrent ( Nelson Mandela was on it until a couple of years ago.) And the wording of the colloquy is broad enough that it could very well mean that if, say, you meet with someone in a terrorist group and advise them to turn to nonviolent means, then thatís material assistance to terrorism. Iíve met with people who are on the list and will continue to do so, and Obama wants to criminalize that, which is a plain attack on freedom of speech. I just donít understand why heís doing it.


The NDAA suit, of which Iím a plaintiff - it mostly codifies existing practice. While there has been some protest over the indefinite detention clause, thereís one aspect of it that Iím not entirely happy with. The only protest thatís being raised is in response to detention of American citizens, but I donít see why we should have the right to detain anyone without trial. The provision of the NDAA that allows for this should not be tolerated. It was banned almost eight centuries ago in the Magna Carta.


Itís the same with the drone killings. There was some protest over the Anwar Al-Awlaki killing because he was an American citizen. But what about someone who isnít an American citizen? Do we have a right to murder them if the president feels like it?



[...]

Read the full article at: alternet.org

Related: Noam Chomsky - Controlled Asset Of The New World Order




Tune into Red Ice Radio:

Dan Johnson - Hour 1 - People Against the National Defense Authorization Act

John B. Wells - Hour 1 - The Police State

Charles Farrier - No CCTV, Campaign Against Big Brother Camera Surveillance

Gregory Sams - Chaos Theory, The State is Out of Date & Bottom Up Organization

Brian Gerrish - Common Purpose & Neuro Linguistic Programming

Radio 3Fourteen - Mike Seibert - Asset Forfeiture, Endangered Rights & Judicial Tyranny



Related Articles
Living Under Drones
Obama cries, yet dismisses the ďcollateral casualtiesĒ of drone warfare
Drone Carnage, Children Slaughtered: The Moral Question Obama Canít Evade
"Whatever Is Left Is Just Pieces of Bodies and Cloth": The Horror of Living Under Drones
Big Brother, Kill Lists, and Secrecy: What to Expect from Obamaís Second Term
"Disposition Matrix": Presidentís 10-Year Plan for the Kill List


Latest News from our Front Page

Swedish politician: US is the true cause of the masses of refugees from the Middle East
2015-05-28 20:13
Editors Note: And who controls US foreign policy? Listen to Jeff Gates. The present Swedish debate about war refugees from the Middle East is an example of peer restricted expression. In the name of political correctness or perceived decency, any questioning of maximum generosity in opening Swedish borders for the refugees is indignantly rejected by the official mainstream. We have a ...
Even if Patriot Act Expires, Government Will Keep Spying on All Americans
2015-05-28 19:52
Government Will Use "Secret Interpretations" to Get Around Legal Prohibitions Mass surveillance under the Patriot Act is so awful that even its author says that the NSA has gone far beyond what the Act intended (and that the intelligence chiefs who said Americans aren't being spied on should be prosecuted for perjury). Specifically, the government is using a "secret interpretation" of the ...
The TPP, Monsanto, Rockefeller, Trilateral Commission, Brzezinski
2015-05-28 19:18
All hands on deck for global, economic, corporate dictatorship There are dots to connect here. They're real, and they're spectacular. Let me begin with a brief exchange from a 1978 interview, conducted by reporter Jeremiah Novak. He was speaking with two American members of the Trilateral Commission (TC), a group founded in 1973 by David Rockefeller and his intellectual flunkey, Zbigniew Brzezinski. NOVAK: ...
Video: Who Owns the Federal Reserve
2015-05-28 19:52
It's not like we don't have half a clue who actually "owns" the Federal Reserve, but we just wanted to know, superficially, who the Fed itself claims it is owned by (and, additionally, how the agency justifies its unchecked power). Apparently the agency never officially answers that question. See for yourself in the video above. Source: truthstreammedia.com
Monsanto's "Discredit Bureau" really does exist
2015-05-28 18:03
Reuters is reporting that Monsanto is demanding a sit-down with members of the World Health Organization (WHO) and the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). This international scientific body is being called on the carpet for reporting that Monsanto’s most widely sold herbicide, which is inextricably linked to the majority of their genetically engineered products, is probably carcinogenic to ...
More News »