Bible Wrong? Jesus was born years earlier than thought, says Pope
By Nick Squires | Telegraph.co.uk
The entire Christian calendar is based on a miscalculation, the Pope has declared, as he claims in a new book that Jesus was born several years earlier than commonly believed.
The ímistakeí was made by a sixth century monk known as Dionysius Exiguus or in English Dennis the Small, the 85-year-old pontiff claims in the book íJesus of Nazareth: The Infancy Narrativesí, published on Wednesday.
"The calculation of the beginning of our calendar Ė based on the birth of Jesus Ė was made by Dionysius Exiguus, who made a mistake in his calculations by several years," the Pope writes in the book, which went on sale around the world with an initial print run of a million copies.
"The actual date of Jesusís birth was several years before."
The assertion that the Christian calendar is based on a false premise is not new Ė many historians believe that Christ was born sometime between 7BC and 2BC.
But the fact that doubts over one of the keystones of Christian tradition have been raised by the leader of the worldís one billion Catholics is striking.
Dennis the Small, who was born in Eastern Europe, is credited with being the "inventor" of the modern calendar and the concept of the Anno Domini era.
He drew up the new system in part to distance it from the calendar in use at the time, which was based on the years since the reign of the Roman emperor Diocletian.
The emperor had persecuted Christians, so there was good reason to expunge him from the new dating system in favour of one inspired by the birth of Christ.
The monkís calendar became widely accepted in Europe after it was adopted by the Venerable Bede, the historian-monk, to date the events that he recounted in his Ecclesiastical History of the English People, which he completed in AD 731.
But exactly how Dennis calculated the year of Christís birth is not clear and the Popeís claim that he made a mistake is a view shared by many scholars.
The Bible does not specify a date for the birth of Christ. The monk instead appears to have based his calculations on vague references to Jesusís age at the start of his ministry and the fact that he was baptised in the reign of the emperor Tiberius.
Christís birth date is not the only controversy raised by the Pope in his new book Ė he also said that contrary to the traditional Nativity scene, there were no oxen, donkeys or other animals at Jesusís birth.
He also weighs in on the debate over Christís birthplace, rejecting arguments by some scholars that he was born in Nazareth rather than Bethlehem.
John Barton, Professor of the Interpretation of the Holy Scripture at Oriel College, Oxford University, said most academics agreed with the Pope that the Christian calendar was wrong and that Jesus was born several years earlier than commonly thought, probably between 6BC and 4BC.
"There is no reference to when he was born in the Bible - all we know is that he was born in the reign of Herod the Great, who died before 1AD," he told The Daily Telegraph. "Itís been surmised for a very long time that Jesus was born before 1AD - no one knows for sure."
The idea that Christ was born on Dec 25 also has no basis in historical fact. "We donít even know which season he was born in. The whole idea of celebrating his birth during the darkest part of the year is probably linked to pagan traditions and the winter solstice."
Article from: telegraph.co.uk
There have been countless interpretations of the birth, life and death of Christ throughout history. One such interpreter is Bill Darlison, former Unitarian Church minister and current vice president of the General Assembly of Unitarian and Free Christian Churches in the United Kingdom. Like others before him, he asks whether Christ was actually born on Dec. 25 or whether perhaps he was born ďon one of about 150 other dates which have been proposed down through the centuries. Was he born in Nazareth or in Bethlehem and, if Bethlehem, was it Bethlehem in Judea or Bethlehem in Galilee?Ē He also argues that the spiritual birth ďis always a virgin birth, because it is not related in any sense (except symbolically) to physical birth.Ē In 2004, TIME asked the same question, with David Van Biema wondering if ďone might be tempted to abandon the whole Nativity story as Ďunhistoric,í mere theological backing and filling.ĒSource: TIME
The historical revisionism continues with the Pope raising the issue of the presence of animals at the birth of Christ. He reveals in Jesus of Nazareth that ďthere is no mention of animals in the Gospels.Ē This may come as a shock to the thousands of schools currently preparing their Nativity plays. But Pope Benedict reassures his readers not to worry ó that ďno one will give up the oxen and the donkey in their Nativity scenes,Ē notes the Telegraph. Even if animals did not feature at the birth, the Vatican seems happy to keep up the myth as it presents an elaborate life-size Nativity scene in St. Peterís Square this Christmas.
Also tune into Red Ice Radio:
Santos Bonacci - Hour 1 - The Holy Science
Tom Horn - Hour 1 - Petrus Romanus: The Final Pope
Joseph Atwill - Hour 1 - Caesarís Messiah, The Roman Conspiracy to Invent Jesus
Acharya S - Hour 1 - The Christ Conspiracy
Kenneth Humphreys - Jesus Never Existed, Judaism & Christianity
Leo Rutherford - Religion, The Greatest Fraud Ever Sold
Dennis Price - The Missing Years of Jesus
Winter Laake - Hour 1 - Satanism & Lucifer the Liberator
The history of our current calendar
Pope Says Christian Calendar Based on Miscalculation
What is Biblical Numerology?
"Gospel of Jesusí Wife" Faces Authenticity Tests
Jesus Christ the Man: Does the Physical Evidence Hold Up?
Too holy for sex? The problem of a married Jesus
What would Jesus do?: The rise of a slogan
Whatís Keeping Jesus?
Jesus Christ Master Mason
Israeli scholar completes mission to ífixí Bible
New Bible translation has screenplay format
Godís Wife Edited Out of the Bible - Almost (Videos)
Israeli software supports theory that Bible was written by multiple authors
Pagan Mythology in the Jesus Story
Pagan Origins of the Christ Myth
Astrology and Pagan Symbolism in Christianity
Latest News from our Front Page
Professor: Reason Itself Is A White Male Construct
A philosophy and religion professor at Syracuse University gave an interview to The New York Times Thursday in which he critiqued the notion of pure reason as simply being a “white male Euro-Christian construction.”
Prof. John Caputo was being interviewed by fellow philosophy professor George Yancy for the 13th installment of an interview series Yancy conducts with philosophers regarding racial topics.
Given its emphasis on first principles ...
The Broken Window Fallacy
Youtube description: This short video explains one of the most persistent economic fallacies of our day.
Jenji Kohan and the Jewish Hyper-Sexualization of Western Culture
As detailed in The Culture of Critique, Freud and his followers regarded anti-Semitism was a universal pathology which had its roots in sexual repression. The theoretical basis for this can be found in Freud’s Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality where he linked aggression to the frustration of human drives — especially the sex drive. Kevin MacDonald notes that: ...
Confederate History - Dispelling the Myths
History books, the media, the school systems, etc abound in falsehoods and inaccuracies of Confederate and Southern history. This fact sheet will help to clarify and dispell some of these rampant inaccuracies.
MYTH - The War of 1861 - 1865 was fought over slavery.
FACT - Terribly untrue. The North fought the war over money. Plain ...
Gays Rights May Open Door for Pedophile Rights
Democrats have attempted to normalize pedophilia as a sexual orientation.
A recent Supreme Court ruling on same-sex marriage may soon allow pedophiles to argue they are suffering discrimination.
‚ÄúUsing the same tactics used by ‚Äėgay‚Äô rights activists, pedophiles have begun to seek similar status arguing their desire for children is a sexual orientation no different than heterosexual or homosexuals,‚ÄĚ writes Jack Minor ...
|More News » |