When Will the Killing War in Iran Begin? It Already Has
By Stephen Gowans | InformationClearingHouse
While campaigns are organized to deter the United States and Israel from acting on threats to launch an air war against Iran, both countries, in league with the European Union (winner of this years Nobel Peace Prize) carry on a low-intensity war against Iran that is likely to be causing more human suffering and death than strikes on Irans nuclear facilities would. This is a war against public health, aimed at the most vulnerable: cancer patients, hemophiliacs, kidney dialysis patients, and those awaiting transplants. Its victims are unseen, dying anonymously in hospitals, not incinerated in spectacular explosions touched off by cruise missiles and bunker buster bombs. But ordinary Iranians who cant get needed medications are every bit as much victims of war as those blown apart by bombs. And yet, we think, that as long as the bombs dont rain down, that peace has been preserved. Perhaps it has, in formal terms, but bleeding to death in the crater of a bomb, or bleeding to death because you cant get hemophilia drugs, is, in either case, death.
In Iran today there is an acute shortage of pharmaceuticals for kidney dialysis and transplants and for treating cancer, hemophilia, thalessemia, multiple sclerosis, and other disorders. Hospital equipment is breaking down for want of spare parts. And raw materials used by domestic pharmaceutical manufacturersblocked by Western sanctionsare in short supply. It adds up to a healthcare crisis. The United States and European Union say their sanctions dont apply to drugs and medical equipment, but US and European banks are unwilling to handle financial transactions with Iran. If they do, the US Treasury Department will deny them access to the US banking system. Since isolation from the worlds largest economy would guarantee their demise, banks comply and shun Iran. As a consequence, few goods from the West make their way into the country, the exemptions for drugs and medical equipment being nothing more than a public relations ruse to disguise the barbarity of the sanctions. Not that Washington is denying that its sanctions are hurting ordinary Iranians. Its just that responsibility for their consequences is denied. US president Barak Obama has said the Iranian people should blame their own leaders.  For whatfailing to knuckle under?
In contrast to wars easily observable casualties, the apparently nonviolent consequences of economic intervention seem like an acceptable alternative. However
economic sanctions can seriously harm the health of persons who live in targeted nations.  This has been well established and widely accepted in the cases of Iraq in the 1990s and the ongoing US blockade of Cuba. Political scientists John Mueller and Karl Mueller wrote an important paper in Foreign Affairs, in which they showed that economic sanctions may have contributed to more deaths during the post-Cold War era than all weapons of mass destruction throughout history. 
The dangers posed today by such enfeebled, impoverished, and friendless states as Iraq and North Korea are minor indeed, they wrote in 1999. It might be added that the dangers posed by Iran to the physical safety of US citizens are not only minor but infinitesimally small. Notwithstanding the fevered fantasies of rightwing commentators, Iran has neither the means, nor the required death wish, to strike the United States. Nor Israel, which has the meansan arsenal of 200 nuclear weaponsto wipe Iran off the face of the earth. However, the danger the country poses to the idea of US domination and hence, to the banks, corporations, and major investors who dominate US policy-making are admittedly somewhat greater.
Severe economic sanctions, the Muellers contend, ought to be designated by the older label of economic warfare. In past wars economic embargoes caused huge numbers of deaths. Some 750,000 German civilians may have died because of the Allied naval blockade during World War I. 
So long as they can coordinate their efforts, the two political scientists continue, the big countries have at their disposal a credible, inexpensive and potent weapon for use against small and medium-sized foes. The dominant powers have shown that they can inflict enormous pain at remarkably little cost to themselves or the global economy. Indeed, in a matter of months or years whole economies can be devastated
 And with devastated economies, come crumbling healthcare systems and failure to provide for the basic healthcare rights of the population.
We might ask, then, why the United States and European Union, practitioners of economic warfare against Iran, are bent on destroying Irans economy, along with its public health system. Sanctions, New York Times reporter Rick Gladstone writes, have subjected ordinary Iranians to increased deprivations in order to punish Iran for enriching uranium that the West suspects is a cover for developing the ability to make nuclear weapons.  In other words, Iran is suspected of having a secret nuclear weapons program, and so must be sanctioned to force it to abandon it.
Contrary to Gladstone, the West doesnt really believe that Tehran has a secret nuclear weapons program, yet even if we accept it does believe this, the position is indefensible. Why should Iranians be punished for developing a capability that the countries that have imposed sanctions already have?
The reason why, it will be said, is because Iranians are bent on developing nuclear weapons to destroy Israel. Didnt Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad threaten to wipe Israel off the map?
Regurgitated regularly by US hawks and Israeli politicians to mobilize support for the bombing of Iran, the claim is demagogic rubbish. Ahmadinejad predicted that Israel as a Zionist state would someday disappear much as South Africa as an apartheid state did. He didnt threaten the physical destruction of Israel and expressed only the wish that historic Palestine would become a multinational democratic state of Arabs and the Jews whose ancestors arrived in Palestine before Zionist settlers. 
No less damaging to the argument that Iranians aspire to take Israel out in a hail of nuclear missiles is the reality that it would take decades for Iran to match Israels already formidable nuclear arsenal, if indeed it aspires to. For the foreseeable future, Israel is in a far better position to wipe Iran off the map. And given Israels penchant for flexing its US-built military muscle, is far more likely to be the wiper than wipee. Already it has almost wiped an entire people from the map of historic Palestine.
But this is irrelevant, for the premise that the West suspects Iran of developing a nuclear weapons capability is false. To be sure, the mass media endlessly recycle the fiction that the West suspects Irans uranium enrichment program is a cover for a nuclear weapons program, but who in the West suspects this? Not high officials of the US state, for they have repeatedly said that theres no evidence that Iran has a secret nuclear weapons program.
The consensus view of the United States 16 intelligence agencies is that Iran abandoned its nuclear weapons program years ago. Director of US intelligence James Clapper said there was no evidence that (Iran) had made a decision on making a concerted push to build a weapon. David H. Petraeus, the C.I.A. director, concurred with that view
. Other senior United States officials, including Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta and Gen. Martin E. Dempsey, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, have made similar statements. 
Rather than weakening this conclusion, stepped up US espionage has buttressed it. Irans leaders have opted for now against
designing a nuclear warhead, said one former intelligence official briefed on US intelligence findings. It isnt the absence of evidence, its the evidence of an absence. Certain things are not being done  that would indicate that Iran is working on nuclear weapons. Even Mossad, Israelis intelligence agency does not disagree with the US on the weapons program, according to a former senior US intelligence official. 
So, contrary to the claim that the West suspects Iran of concealing a nuclear weapons program, no one in a position of authority in the US state believes this to be true. Neither does Israeli intelligence. Why, then, is the United States and its allies subjecting ordinary Iranians to increased deprivations through sanctions?
The answer, according to Henry Kissinger, is because US policy in the Middle East for the last half century has been aimed at preventing any power in the region from emerging as a hegemon. This is another way of saying that the aim of US Middle East policy is to stop any Middle Eastern country from challenging its domination by the United States. Iran, Kissinger points out, has emerged as the principal challenger. 
Indeed, it did so as long ago as 1979, when the local extension of US power in Iran, the Shah, was overthrown, and the country set out on a path of independent economic and political development. For the revolutionaries boldness in asserting their sovereignty, Washington pressed Saddam Husseins Iraq into a war with Iran. This served the same purpose as todays economic warfare, sabotage, threats of military intervention, and assassinations of Irans nuclear scientists: to weaken the country and stifle its development; to prevent it from thriving and thereby becoming an example to other countries of development possibilities outside US domination.
Read the full article at: informationclearinghouse.info
Act of War? President Obama Ordered Wave Of Cyber Attacks Against Iran
Iran says CIA behind nuclear scientists killing
Economic Warfare & Strangling Sanctions: Punishing Iran for its Defiance of the United States
Iran cut off from global financial system
IRAN LIE same as IRAQ LIE
The Complete Idiots Guide To Iran And The Bomb, Or: How I Learned To Stop Worrying And Love The Facts
Dangerous Crossroads in World History: Obamas New Iran Sanctions: An Act of War
Latest News from our Front Page
Feminist blogger uses her vaginal yeast to make sourdough bread
It's a tale that might ensure you never look the same way at a humble loaf again.
When a feminist blogger found herself suffering from a vaginal yeast infection, she made the unusual decision to use the unwanted bodily fluid as an ingredient for making bread.
Zoe Stavri, who writes under the title Another Angry Woman, has documented the details of her ...
Apple could be working on virtual reality projector, patents show
The company has been granted a patent for an âadaptive projectorâ, which can project images onto surfaces
Apple could be working on a new augmented reality projector, which would allow it to make computers without even adding a screen.
The company has been granted a patent for an âadaptiveâ projector, reports Patently Apple. The patents seem to refer to a tool ...
83-year-old Romanian Jewess crowned "Miss Holocaust Survivor" in Israel
83-year-old Romanian born Rita Berkowitz wins the one-of-a-kind charity beauty pageant
Romania-born woman who immigrated to Israel won the third annual Miss Holocaust Survivors Beauty Pageant in Haifa.
Rita Berkowitz, 83, was chosen among the 16 European natives who participated in the contest on Tuesday. She came to Israel in 1951.
Hairdressers and makeup artists primped and pampered the contestants before they took ...
North Vancouver schools get first gender-neutral washroom
In a first for North Vancouver schools, Seycove secondary has opened a gender-neutral washroom.
The move is a step in the right direction and recognition that not every student feels welcome in the binary male- or female-designated washrooms, according to Brian Wilson, president of Seycoveâs Queer Straight Alliance Club, which lobbied the school administration for the washroom.
High school is already a ...
Newly-Completed Fukushima 'Containment' Wall Already 'Slightly Leaning'
Just weeks after re-starting the building of a giant ice-wall to contain groundwater leaking from the Fukushima nuclear plant, TEPCO has been forced to admit that a 780-meter protective wall built alongside the crippled power station (completed only last month and designed to prevent contaminated groundwater from seeping into the sea) is already "slightly leaning." While this sounds a lot ...
|More News » |