Former CIA agent John Kiriakou pleaded guilty Tuesday morning to crimes related to blowing the whistle on the US governmentís torture of suspected terrorists and was sentenced to two-and-a-half years in prison.
The Wall Street Journal reports that Kiriakou, 48, agreed to admit to one count of disclosing information identifying a covert agent early Tuesday, just hours after his attorney entered a change of plea in an Alexandria, Virginia courtroom outside of Washington, DC.
Kiriakou was originally charged under the Espionage Act of 1917 after he went public with the Central Intelligence Agencyís use of waterboarding on captured insurgents in the wake of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attack. On Monday morning, though, legal counsel for the accused former CIA agent informed the court that Kiriakou was willing to plead guilty to a lesser crime.
Initially, Kiriakou pleaded not guilty to the charge that he had outted two intelligence agents directly tied to the drowning-simulation method by going to the press with their identities.
As RT reported last week, defense attorneys had hoped that the government would be tasked with having to prove that Kiriakou had intent to harm America when he went to the media. Instead, however, prosecutors were told theyíd only need to prove that the former government employee was aware that his consequences had the potential to put the country in danger.
Had Kiriakou been convicted under the initial charges filed in court, he could have been sentenced to upwards of five decades behind bars.
ďLetís be clear, there is one reason, and one reason only, that John Kiriakou is taking this plea: for the certainty that heíll be out of jail in 2 1/2 years to see his five children grow up,Ē Jesselyn Raddack, a former Justice Department official who blew the whistle on Bush administrationís mishandling in the case of ďAmerican TalibanĒ John Walker Lindh, wrote Tuesday.
Kiriakou, Raddack wrote, was all but certain to enter the Alexandria courthouse on Tuesday and plead guilty to the lesser charge of violating the Intelligence Identities Protection Act (IIPA), explaining, ďthere are no reported cases interpreting it because itís nearly impossible to proveĖfor ďoutingĒ a torturer.Ē
ďíOutingí is in quotes because the charge is not that Kiriakouís actions resulted in a public disclosure of the name, but that through a Kevin Bacon-style chain of causation, GITMO torture victims learned the name of one of their possible torturers,Ē Raddack wrote. ďRegardless, how does outing a torturer hurt the national security of the U.S.? Itís like arguing that outing a Nazi guarding a concentration camp would hurt the national security of Germany.Ē
Read the full article at: globalresearch.ca