In 1966, curators at the archaeological museum of the University of Pennsylvania bought a pile of gorgeous Bronze Age jewelry from a Philadelphia dealer. They couldnt know their purchase would change how museums work.
The 24 gold objects had come to Penn with no trace of where theyd been unearthed, or how. That left scholars there without much clue about why and when the gold had been worked, or by whom and with the suspicion that it had been dug up by looters. Frustrated, they decided to take steps to prevent this kind of homelessness for other antiquities. In 1970, they issued a declaration (a Philadelphia tradition, after all) insisting that the Penn museum would no longer acquire ancient objects whose history could not be properly tracked. Later that year, a UNESCO convention on cultural property suggested the same rule for all other museums, and since then, reputable institutions have pretty much toed that line.
Last week, Penn brought things full circle by announcing that it was more or less undoing the 1966 acquisition that had helped raise the issue. Thanks to a new agreement hammered out with the Turkish Ministry of Culture and Tourism, Penns so-called Trojan Gold will be sent to Turkey on indefinite loan, to live in a new museum planned for a site near Troy itself. (Chemical analysis of a speck of dirt lodged in the 4,400-year-old jewelry now hints that, just as scholars had long guessed, it once came from Trojan landsalthough long before Homers war there.) In exchange, Penns museum will get to host shows built on loans from great Turkish excavations, and its archaeologists will continue to have privileged access to those digs.
Were not just a museum that shows objects made in other countries, says Brian Rose, a Penn archaeologist involved in the negotiations. The museum is dedicated to the archaeological narratives that go with such objects, Rose says, and those will run deeper with the golds repatriation to Troy. Every archaeologist would like to see the material taken from a particular site, or excavated from that site, displayed near that site, Rose says. I certainly value the context of an object as one of the most important components of that object. He explains that Penn also wanted to make a strong statement about looting and cultural preservationas per its long-ago declarationand above all wanted to cement the museums close collaboration with Turkey. That was the real issue at the heart of the decision, according to Rose. Archaeologists have to be diplomats as much as they have to know the archaeology of the ancient world, because theres a political dimension to everything we do now.
A variety of Bronze Age earrings from Penns Trojan Gold.
That political dimension, and the extreme caution it breeds, is precisely what some players are pushing against. Three weeks ago, the Cleveland Museum of Art announced that it had bought a wonderful head of Drusus Minor, the bloodthirsty son of the Roman emperor Tiberius. (Tiberius was the Caesar whom Christ wanted us to render unto.) David Franklin, the museums director, calls it a strong and stunning object that will now rank among the CMAs top 50 treasures. The thing isand Franklin says he knew this would make wavesthe 2,000-year-old marble head didnt come with a slam-dunk paper trail proving that it could not have been illegally unearthed since the time of the UNESCO convention. The French owners who first put the Drusus head on the market, in 2004, bore witness to a family tradition that it had come with them from Algeria in 1960, and that theyd already owned it for almost a century by then. Franklin felt this oral history gave him enough to run with: We did as much if not more than anyone could have done to research this object ... If all the arrows are pointing in one direction, you can make a reasoned assumption, he says. The inevitable risks that this assumption might turn out wrong are balanced, he feels, by the open access that scholars and visitors now have to this wonderful work of art. These objects were not created as antiquitiesas evidence, that is, for use by modern historiansthey were created as art. The artists themselves created these objects to be admired. He also points to the long-term protection the Drusus head will now get, as it never would out on the open market passing from collector to collector. (Its tiny traces of original colored paint might be especially at risk.) These things are fragile, and they should last foreveras they might in a museum, Franklin says. He argues, only half in jest, for a bill of rights for works of art, built around what they might need to survive and prosper.
Professor: Reason Itself Is A White Male Construct 2015-07-04 3:55
A philosophy and religion professor at Syracuse University gave an interview to The New York Times Thursday in which he critiqued the notion of pure reason as simply being a “white male Euro-Christian construction.”
Prof. John Caputo was being interviewed by fellow philosophy professor George Yancy for the 13th installment of an interview series Yancy conducts with philosophers regarding racial topics.
Given its emphasis on first principles ...
The Broken Window Fallacy 2015-07-04 3:48
Youtube description: This short video explains one of the most persistent economic fallacies of our day.
Jenji Kohan and the Jewish Hyper-Sexualization of Western Culture 2015-07-04 3:33
As detailed in The Culture of Critique, Freud and his followers regarded anti-Semitism was a universal pathology which had its roots in sexual repression. The theoretical basis for this can be found in Freud’s Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality where he linked aggression to the frustration of human drives — especially the sex drive. Kevin MacDonald notes that: ...
Confederate History - Dispelling the Myths 2015-07-03 3:28
History books, the media, the school systems, etc abound in falsehoods and inaccuracies of Confederate and Southern history. This fact sheet will help to clarify and dispell some of these rampant inaccuracies.
MYTH - The War of 1861 - 1865 was fought over slavery.
FACT - Terribly untrue. The North fought the war over money. Plain ...
Gays Rights May Open Door for Pedophile Rights 2015-07-03 3:31
Democrats have attempted to normalize pedophilia as a sexual orientation.
A recent Supreme Court ruling on same-sex marriage may soon allow pedophiles to argue they are suffering discrimination.
âUsing the same tactics used by âgayâ rights activists, pedophiles have begun to seek similar status arguing their desire for children is a sexual orientation no different than heterosexual or homosexuals,â writes Jack Minor ...