By James M. Roberts | FoxNews.com
Delegates from around the world will descend on Rio de Janeiro, this week for a major United Nations meeting on the environment. Dubbed "Rio+20," the event, will commemorate the 20th anniversary of the first Earth Summit.
But, you might say, didnt 15,000 or so of these same bureaucrats and environmental activists gather at another world class beach resortin Durban, South Africa just six months ago to discuss more-or-less the same issues? Why the need for another meeting so soon?
The largely redundant Rio meeting provides the perfect occasion to reassess American taxpayer support for several Green non-governmental organizations (NGOs) that have been undermining US policies and priorities for well over two decades.
Under the rubric of Corporate Social Responsibility many Green groups have asserted that companies have triple-bottom-line obligations. This theory insists companies must deliver (1) economic, (2) social and (3) environmental returns to justify the theoretical license to operate granted to them by society.
One Green NGO, the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), will promote its Report or Explain policy in Rio. It demands that private companies report their sustainability performance or explain why if they do not. GRI wants governments to provide regulation [emphasis added] and policy that promotes this kind of innovation and creativity.
Both GRI and WWF call for a global green economy and propose several mechanisms to control and manipulate innovation, commerce, and trade.
For starters they want all tradable goods certified to ensure they meet sustainability standards. Those standards, of course, would be set by these very same groups. That would give groups such as WWF tremendous influence over the global trade of commodities such fish, paper, cocoa, tropical woods, beef, palm oil and more.
Indeed, last week in Washington, WWF partnered with the Consumer Goods Forum to urge major Western retailers to procure only sustainably-sourced palm oil. The utilization of these standards will raise consumer costs and hurt small farmers throughout the world who need unencumbered access to markets. In fact, denying small producers access to world markets would well lead to more environmental damage and increased poverty than would leaving them alone hence the insidious nature of WWFs calls for certification.
Read the full article at: foxnews.com
Also tune into:
Eric Karlstrom - Hour 1 - Behind The Green Curtain
Eric Karlstrom - Hour 2 - Behind The Green Curtain
Tim Ball - Climategate & The Anthropogenic Global Warming Fraud
Jerry E. Smith - The "Green" Conspiracy
James Corbett - Transhumanism, Neofeudalism & the Green Movement