The Bush-Clinton Dynasty in charge of America for 28 consecutive years? (Video)
2007 07 25

By Henrik Palmgren | redicecreations.com


There was one decent question (from the selected ones) at the CNN/YouTube democratic "debates". The question was for Hillary Clinton, she didnít answer, but Senator Mike Gravel did.

(See the clip below)

Question for Hillary Clinton:
"With Bush (Sr), Clinton (Bill) and Bush (Jr) again serving as the last three presidents, how would electing you, a Clinton constitute the type of change in Washington so many people in the heartland are yearning for and what your campaign has been talking about? I was also wondering if any of the other candidates have a problem with the same two families being in charge of the executive branch of government for 28 consecutive years if Hillary Clinton where to potentially to be elected and then re-elected."
Hillary doesnít address the topic, instead recoils to some Bush Bashing and then jokes away the fact that the election was stolen in 2000 by Bush. (Everybody Laughs!)

The only one addressing the question was Senator Mike Gravel:
"The Democratic Party used to stand for the ordinary working man but the Clinton's and the DLC sold out the Democratic Party to Wall street. Look at where all the money is being raised right now: for Hillary, Obama and Edwards. It's the hedge funds, it's wall street bankers, it's the people who brought you what you have today! Please Wake up! Just look at the New York Times of the 17th of July that analyses where the money is coming from, it comes the Bankers on Wall street and of course hedge funds which is code for Bankers on Wall street and their Lock, Stock, & Barrel in their pockets."
In an effort to end the dead silence on stage and in the audience, Obama steers it away and goes off on a tangent about cynicism while the producer cut's to footage of Mike Gravel.



More: Obama, Clinton Draw Wall Street Donors Amid Bush Disenchantment

Read more about the Bush-Clinton Dynasty

In an earlier question Mike Gravel mentions a few things about lobbyist money.


More: New York City Investment Banks Give More Money to Obama Than to Clinton



Related Articles
The Bush-Clinton Dynasty
Debate brings Youtube to centre of 2008 presidential campaign
Obama Top Fundraiser on Wall Street
Clinton and Obama Raiding Donors Who Backed Bush
bushclintonkatrinafund.org
Hillary 2008 - The Year Of The Lizard
Red Ice Creations Radio - Kent Daniel Bentkowski - 'Big Sister' Hillary Clinton
Hillary Clinton awarded honorary doctorate by Swedens Gothenburg University
Hillary Clinton took donations from convicted drug smuggler Jorge Cabrera


Latest News from our Front Page

Why Canít We Publish Addresses Of New York Times Reporters?
2014 11 28
New York Times reporters Julie Bosman and Campbell Robertson published the address of Darren Wilson in the New York Times so here are their addresses. GotNews.com strenuously objects to publishing the addresses of individuals who are being targeted with death threats. GotNews.com published the address of Ebola patient Nina Pham so that people could avoid going to her Dallas apartment. But it would ...
Terrorists? Interview with Varg Vikernes and Marie Cachet
2014 11 28
Marie Cachet and Varg Vikernes are what we call commonly ordinary people. However, for motives meanly political, the Ministry of the Interior decided to abuse its power to damage them ; "there is nothing more annoying than a low man placed in high position." (Roman saying) Today, Varg risks the eviction of the French territory without valid ground. Three very ...
The Coudenhove-Kalergi Plan - The Genocide Of The People Of Europe
2014 11 28
Mass immigration is a phenomenon, the causes of which are still cleverly concealed by the system, and the multicultural propaganda is trying to falsely portray it as inevitable. With this article we intend to prove once and for all, that this is not a spontaneous phenomenon. What they want to present as an inevitable outcome of modern life, is actually ...
Starbucks Supports Pro-GMO Company
2014 11 26
Another reason why you should not go to Starbucks. Starbucks has an image of being a socially responsible, environmentally friendly company (Really?). In 2013, 95 percent of their coffee was ethically sourced, and their goal is to reach 100 percent by 2015.1 Other goals include reducing water consumption by 25 percent in their company-operated stores by 20152 and mobilizing their employees and ...
Group Polarization and the Fad of Ethno-masochism
2014 11 26
From "Group polarization: A critical review and meta-analysis". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 6 50 (6): 1141--1151 The psychology of White self hatred. Political correctness IS a mental disorder. More: Group polarization: A critical review and meta-analysis. Isenberg, Daniel J. the paper Indoctrinate U Harvard Professor Noel Ignatiev talks about how to end the White race The History of Political Correctness The Narrative: The origins of Political ...
More News Ľ