A cautious Obama urges Americans to ‘turn the page’ on Iraq
By Holly Bailey | YahooNews.com
President Obama faced a major dilemma heading into Tuesday’s prime-time address on Iraq: How do you mark the milestone of a campaign promise fulfilled when what has happened in Iraq isn’t exactly "mission accomplished"? It was an obstacle that Obama never quite overcame in his 18-minute speech, which was remarkably disjointed for a president well known for his eloquence.
In only his second Oval Office address, Obama was careful not to use words like "victory" or "win" when announcing the end of U.S. combat operations in Iraq. That’s because Iraq, seven and a half years and thousands of lost American lives later, remains a largely dysfunctional democracy, heavily dependent on U.S. aid. While Obama met his political goal of withdrawing combat troops, 50,000 American personnel will remain on the ground there until at least next year, as the threat of violence in the region continues.
"Violence will not end with our combat mission," Obama warned. "Extremists will continue to set off bombs, attack Iraqi civilians and try to spark sectarian strife." But ultimately, the president insisted, "these terrorists will fail to achieve their goals."
The president then somberly tried to shift the focus, saying it’s time "turn the page" away from one crisis to a pair of others. He braced Americans for what will be continued sacrifice both at home, as the nation struggles to rebuild a collapsed economy, and abroad, where continued American bloodshed in Afghanistan is a virtual certainty.
"This historic moment comes at a time of great uncertainty for many Americans. We have now been through nearly a decade of war. We have endured a long and painful recession. And sometimes in the midst of these storms, the future that we are trying to build for our nation -- a future of lasting peace and long-term prosperity -- may seem beyond our reach," Obama said.
The president fleetingly acknowledged his own opposition to the Iraq war, mentioning that he had disagreed with former President George W. Bush, with whom he spoke earlier today. He did not mention he opposed the 2007 troop surge that was widely credited for turning the Iraq effort around. Instead, in a pitch aimed squarely at Democrats who have been increasingly critical of the war in Afghanistan, Obama insisted it was time to "turn the page" here, too, and refocus on what had been the larger goal of both wars: preventing another al-Qaida attack on the U.S. and its allies.
"But, as was the case in Iraq, we cannot do for Afghans what they must ultimately do for themselves," Obama said, repeating his pledge to begin withdrawing troops from Afghanistan next July. "The pace of our troop reductions will be determined by conditions on the ground, and our support for Afghanistan will endure. But make no mistake: This transition will begin — because open-ended war serves neither our interests nor the Afghan people’s."
Pivoting to domestic issues, Obama said the nation’s "most urgent task" is rebuilding an economy that has been put under pressure by paying for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan — though he offered no specifics. "We must tackle those challenges at home with as much energy and grit and sense of common purpose as our men and women in uniform who have served abroad," the president said. "This will be difficult. But in the days to come, it must be our central mission as a people, and my central responsibility as president."
Ahead of a crucial midterm election, Obama’s goal in the speech was to remind the public of a promise he had delivered on and mark a moment of transition for the nation. But by tying together two messy wars with no clear ends and an economic struggle that defies easy solutions, the president’s sometimes confusing remarks tonight were less the mark of an important milestone and more of a somber reminder of the difficult days ahead for him and the country.
You can view the entire speech here.
Article from: news.yahoo.com
The End of the Combat Mission in Iraq
Video from: YouTube.com
US psywar plan includes 2 hot wars
US wasted billions in rebuilding Iraq (Contractors make a killing)
Iraq Exit: Rebranding the Occupation (Video)
Obama: US commitment in Iraq is shifting
Latest News from our Front Page
4 beheaded in Saudi Arabia less than a week into King Salman's rule
Comment: So when will the the "Human rights" promoting liberal west elite decide invade Saudi Arabia like they did Libya?
Members of Magic Movement stage a mock execution scene in protest of Saudi Arabia beheading of eight Bangladeshi workers in October 2011.
Four people have been executed in Saudi Arabia less than a week after 79-year-old King Salman assumed power following the ...
Swedish Office Block Pushes Microchips on its Staff
Sweden is heading over the cliff in multiple areas, all at once. They are pushing the abolition of cash, run amok state feminism, gender war, pacification of the police and perhaps even more frightening: open borders. A policy that have given the country a "gold medal" in asylum seeker acceptance. Run away
Charlie Hebdo: Where Neocons, Zionists, Masons and Communists Converge
Charlie Hebdo, raising the banner of revolt, has always regurgitated precisely what the “system” required.
Charlie Hebdo (CH) came out of the New Left milieu of the 1960s and is a product of the 1968 revolt against President Charles de Gaulle. It happens that the most famous of the New Left revolts came at a time when (1) the CIA was ...
The Liberation of Auschwitz
This article is perhaps a day late, but it will be some time before talk of the Holocaust subsides in the mainstream press, especially now that we are to have a vast new Holocaust Memorial Centre built with £50 million of taxpayers money in central London, to replace the rather unimpressive one that already exists in Hyde Park.
In the various ...
Facebook’s New ‘Chinese-style’ Political Censorship System Goes Global
Last week 21WIRE reported on Facebook’s new communitarian policy whereby readers can ‘flag’ content as “fake news” if they believe it’s not real, or if they do not like it. In the wake of the Charlie Hebdo False Flag event, the social media giant is now allowing governments to determine what is ‘good free speech’, and what is not.
“An article ...
|More News » |