London unveils creepy-looking mascots for 2012 Olympics - Rife with Symbolism
2010-05-20 0:00

By Elizabeth Leafloor |

London unveils creepy-looking mascots for 2012 Olympics
By Chris Chase |

When the official logo of the 2012 London Olympics was released three years ago, the odd puzzle-piece design was the object of so much scorn that organizers were desperate to avoid similar criticism when they unveiled the mascots for the Games on Wednesday. With the introduction of Wenlock and Mandeville (above), London 2012 organizers realized their goal. The criticism of the mascots wonít be similar to the complaints about the logo. No, theyíll be much, much worse.

Look, I donít know what to say. Olympic mascots have always been the object of scorn (remember Izzy?), but these two, uh, things take the absurdity to a whole new level. Thereís a complicated backstory to the characters which was written by a childrenís author. It explains why the mascots have one eye (itís a camera lens to see the world) and yellow lights on tops of their heads (an homage to London taxicabs), but fails to tell the tale of why they look like early rejects from a Pixar movie. Plus, the fact that some details are explained only makes me wonder about the things that arenít. Why does the one on the left look like itís wearing an oven mitt? Where are their feet? What, are both those design features a metaphor for how we canít run away from global warming?

Officials boasted that focus groups of children helped form the designs of the mascots, which makes total sense because this looks exactly like something a bunch of second-graders would create as a class project. Itís like Wenlock and Mandeville were pieced together from every childís suggestion. "They should have one eye!" "Itíd be cool if they did karate!" "Make them fly!" There was no filter. Instead of simple (like the only good Olympic mascot in history, Barcelonaís Cobi) London went for a design as complicated as can be.

The natural defense of the mascots is that theyíre not designed for adults, but for the children who will convince adults to buy them a bunch of merchandise with said mascots. Thatís a cop-out. Pandering to children isnít an excuse for an uninspired design. The aforementioned Pixar caters to kids, yet its films still resonate with the older set.

Wenlock is named after Much Wenlock, a village in Shropshire which held an event in the 19th century which inspired the modern Games. Mandeville is named after the hospital at which the Paralympic Games were founded. Though both sound like Tolkein characters, the names are quite good and are the only thing that makes the mascots distinctly British.

London 2012 released a video explaining the pairís orgins as well. Somehow, it makes them look even weirder than before:

Video from:

On your marks for the 2012 Olympic blobs: London mascots rival that dreaded logo
By Beth Hale |

They only have one pair of eyes between them and look like Sonic the Hedgehog crossed with a character from the Disney film Monsters Inc.
But you had better get used to these strange blob-like creatures because Wenlock and Mandeville, as they are known, are the mascots for the 2012 Olympics and Paralympics respectively, and will be all over Britain for the next two years.

Following the ridicule over the £400,000 Olympic logo, their creators will be hoping that Wenlock and Mandeville get a more favourable reception - even though they too carry the much-mocked 2012 image.

Mayor of London Boris Johnson said they were a ísolid coalitioní, adding: íItís hard to imagine a mascot more in tune with the times.í

However, the duo, launched with much fanfare last night on BBC1ís The One Show, require a certain amount of explanation before they begin to make any sense.

First, the names, which might ring a few geographical bells: Wenlock is named after the Shropshire town of Much Wenlock where, in the mid-19th century, the Wenlock Games became the inspiration for the modern Olympic movement.

Mandevilleís name is derived from Stoke Mandeville, in Buckinghamshire, home to Stoke Mandeville Hospital.
In the 1940s, Dr Ludwig Guttmann came to the hospital to set up a spinal unit.
Looking for ways to inspire the soldiers in his care he established the Stoke Mandeville Games, widely recognised as a forerunner to the modern Paralympics.

The characters are said to have been fashioned from the last drops of steel left over from the final support girder of the Olympic stadium in Stratford, East London.

The one-eyed figures were created by London-based creative agency Iris, whose clients include Wonderbra and Argos.

The duo have been given their own story, written by author Michael Morpurgo which has been turned into an animated film.
They also get their own website, and even individual Twitter and Facebook pages.

Organisers would not comment on the cost of creating the mascots, which they hope will generate up to £70million through merchandising.
But it is said to have been kept to just ía few thousand poundsí with the help of sponsors.

Stephen Bayley, founder of the Design Museum, believes his daughter summed the mascots up perfectly when she referred to them as írubbish earringsí.

He said: íThe logo was hideous enough but now we have these ridiculous, infantile mascots. Who is to blame for this I ask you?
íGiven the economic predicament that Britain is in at the minute, what right do they have to throw their money at such hideous creatures? They are atrocious.í

London 2012 chairman Lord Coe said the mascots had been created for children and he hoped they would inspire young people to take up sport.

íBy linking young people to the values of sport, Wenlock and Mandeville will help inspire kids to strive to be the best they can be,í he said.
He said that although the designs were bold, that it was a ítangible projectí with a back story that children would love.

íWeíve always been open about this: we wanted to do things differently in London.í

Inspiration? Mike from Monsters Inc., left, and Sonic the Hedgehog.

2012 Mascot Design Rife with Symbolic Messages
By Elizabeth Leafloor |

Trafalgar Square erupted in cheers in 2005 as thousands gathered there to see London win the bid to host the 2012 Summer Olympic games. It was a time of excitement and hope for the future in the UK.

Fast forward two years, and in 2007 the Olympic Organizing committee released their controversial logo.

Bosses of the 2012 Olympics were plunged into a fresh row last night after spending £400,000 on a controversial new logo for the London Games.

In a move billed as the most significant event since London beat Paris in 2005 in the race to host the Games, the organising committee unveiled a striking, jagged emblem as the official symbol for the Olympics.
Aimed at the younger, "internet generation", it will will also be used as the logo for the Paralympics and will be crucial to hopes of raising private sponsorship for both events.

Based roughly on the figures 2012 and apparently inspired by graffiti artists, the image - which replaces an earlier logo devised for Londonís bid to host the Games - was hailed as "dynamic" and "vibrant" by organisers.

Lord Coe, chairman of the London Games organising committee (Locog), said the new logo was "edgy" and appeared to suggest it was designed to provoke a strong reaction: "We donít do bland - this is not a bland city. We werenít going to come to you with a dull or dry corporate logo that would appear on a polo shirt and weíre all gardening in it a yearís time."

Tony Blair raised hopes that the symbol would leave people "inspired to make a positive change in their life" while Jacques Rogge, president of the International Olympic Committee, praised it as a "truly innovative brand" that would appeal to the young.

But the logo, which cost £400,000 and took the best part of a year to be devised by brand consultants Wolff Olins, came up against widespread disapproval yesterday, with one Jewish person even ringing the BBC to complain that it was reminiscent of the infamous Nazi SS symbol.
Design guru Stephen Bayley condemned it as "a puerile mess, an artistic flop and a commercial scandal". Source

Though petitioned to change the logo and to justify the immense cost in its creation, the Olympic committee and creator Wolff Ollins stubbornly and steadfastly refused to allow a change in the logo.

Rik Clay, Ian Crane, and other alternative researchers were quick to point out a glaring message that could be revealed if the logo was simply rearranged slightly:

Official London 2012 Olympic Logo

The word "ZION" can be found in the image when the ínumbersí are rearranged.

Now, in 2010, theyíve created these strange mascots, and the backlash is very similar to the displeasure of 2007.

Though strange in form, and suspect in function, it is nearly certain they will remain as the marketing choice to íinspire kidsí (whether to participate in sports or simply spend gobs of money on expensive merchandise is still debatable).

Though the creators have a message they wish to share with us in the design of íWenlockí and íMandevilleí, there can ever be a subtext to these designs, like in the logo, and it is interesting to speculate on what they would have us think or how they would have us behave when we see these symbols.

Hereís their explanation:

But hereís another interpretation:

Though up to the viewerís discretion, it becomes apparent that not all meanings will be evident to the casual observer. That is often the point of logos and mascots and symbols - the hidden meanings still penetrate the brain even if weíre not conscious of it.

Perhaps there is more to the publicís distaste of these mascots than sheer aesthetics alone.

Time will tell if the "few thousand pounds" spent on these walking symbols will pay off for their creators.

Sieg heil to you, too. Source

Related Articles
Izzy: More marketing disaster than success
World unites online against Londonís Olympic mascots
2012 London Olympics - Wikipedia
Paper Mistakes íPedobearí for Olympic Mascot
Logo Can Make You íThink Differentí
"M" - Wikipedia
2012 : London Zion - The new Jerusalem (Video)
Epilepsy fears over 2012 footage
Symbols and Their Meanings
Illuminati Symbolism In Movies (Video)
The Occult Symbolism of Sherlock Holmes
Lady Gaga - Bad Romance: Check the symbolism! (Video)
Montana Town Occupied By Private Paramilitary Security Force - Check the Symbolism
Heath Ledgerís Last Movie Will Be Packed with Occult Symbolism
Eye Symbolism in Subway Station beneath former WTC Buildings
Rotated Masonic Symbolism (img)
Jonathan Blackís íMystic Londoní on Secret Societies and Symbolism (Video)

Latest News from our Front Page

Professor: Reason Itself Is A White Male Construct
2015-07-04 3:55
A philosophy and religion professor at Syracuse University gave an interview to The New York Times Thursday in which he critiqued the notion of pure reason as simply being a “white male Euro-Christian construction.” Prof. John Caputo was being interviewed by fellow philosophy professor George Yancy for the 13th installment of an interview series Yancy conducts with philosophers regarding racial topics. Given its emphasis on first principles ...
The Broken Window Fallacy
2015-07-04 3:48
Youtube description: This short video explains one of the most persistent economic fallacies of our day. Source:
Jenji Kohan and the Jewish Hyper-Sexualization of Western Culture
2015-07-04 3:33
As detailed in The Culture of Critique, Freud and his followers regarded anti-Semitism was a universal pathology which had its roots in sexual repression. The theoretical basis for this can be found in Freud’s Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality where he linked aggression to the frustration of human drives — especially the sex drive. Kevin MacDonald notes that: ...
Confederate History - Dispelling the Myths
2015-07-03 3:28
History books, the media, the school systems, etc abound in falsehoods and inaccuracies of Confederate and Southern history. This fact sheet will help to clarify and dispell some of these rampant inaccuracies. MYTH - The War of 1861 - 1865 was fought over slavery. FACT - Terribly untrue. The North fought the war over money. Plain ...
Gays Rights May Open Door for Pedophile Rights
2015-07-03 3:31
Democrats have attempted to normalize pedophilia as a sexual orientation. A recent Supreme Court ruling on same-sex marriage may soon allow pedophiles to argue they are suffering discrimination. ‚ÄúUsing the same tactics used by ‚Äėgay‚Äô rights activists, pedophiles have begun to seek similar status arguing their desire for children is a sexual orientation no different than heterosexual or homosexuals,‚ÄĚ writes Jack Minor ...
More News »