Terrorist or militia member, where is the line?
2010-04-13 0:00

By Neil Macdonald | CBC.ca

So letís take a moment and compare Jose Padilla, Americaís once-notorious "dirty bomber," to David Brian Stone, the "Hutaree" leader now residing in a Michigan jail.

Padilla first. Heís an American citizen who converted to fundamentalist Islam in his 20s. Heís been widely described here in the U.S. as an "Islamic terrorist."

The former attorney general himself, John Ashcroft, announced Padillaís arrest in 2002: "We have captured a known terrorist who was exploring a plan to build and explode a radiological dispersion device, or ídirty bomb,í in the United States," Ashcroft told the nation.

The media went nuts, especially the cable networks. WAR ON TERROR banners crawled across every news alert.

Despite his citizenship ó he was born in Brooklyn and raised in Chicago ó Padilla was designated an "illegal enemy combatant" and held without trial for three and a half years in a military prison, where he says he was tortured.

Given the ensuing revelations of secret White House torture guidelines, that is at least a plausible claim.

Finally, he was transferred to civilian courts, where no charge relating to a bomb was ever filed. Instead, he was found guilty of conspiring to participate in a foreign jihad and sentenced to 17 years in prison.

That is serious stuff, but not even in the same league as exploding a dirty bomb. Padilla is appealing.

Christian warriors

Now, David Brian Stone.

Heís also an American citizen and a fundamentalist, too, but with a big difference: Heís a Christian.

Stone and several members of his so-called Hutaree militia are charged with planning to slaughter as many police officers as they could, using a bomb. (Hutaree is apparently a word Stone invented to mean Christian warriors.)


Militia leader David Brian Stone, 44, of Clayton Mich., in a photo supplied by the U.S. Marshals Service following his arrest in March 2010. (Associated Press)

Unlike Padilla, Stone and his friends had explosives, according to the indictment, and were practising with them.

But the Hutarees havenít been designated illegal enemy combatants, despite their avowed hatred of the U.S. government and their desire to topple it.

Instead, they are being held in a civilian jail and have the right to a timely civilian trial. They almost certainly wonít be tortured.

The group has generated considerable media coverage and its members do face some pretty serious charges ó seditious conspiracy, attempted use of a weapon of mass destruction and carrying a firearm during a crime of violence.

They arenít being called terrorists, though. Certainly not "Christian terrorists," despite the accusation that they intended to carry out mass murder in the name of Jesus.

In some accounts, theyíve been made more to sound more like clumsy idiots, which they well may be ódressing up as soldiers, running around in the woods with guns, conducting "covert reconnaissance exercises" and preparing for the arrival of the Final Offensive of Big Government, or whatever.

A specific plan

But they did, according to the U.S. Justice Department, have a specific plan.

Because they regard the government as evil, and police as its "foot soldiers," they intended to execute a police officer and, then, when the inevitable big official police funeral took place, they intended to bomb it.


The trailer home of David Brian Stone, the leader of the Michigan based Christian militia that he calls Hutaree. (Madalyn Ruggiero/Associated Press)

In raids last week, police recovered, among other things, 13,000 rounds of ammunition and 46 guns, including two powerful .50-calibre weapons.

And yet no media hysteria. No clanging terror bulletins.

Fox News Channel has been relatively silent. I havenít heard a word about the Hutarees from Sarah Palin, either, and her terrorist radar is always on full alert.

Even the mainstream media, which has made "terrorist" one of the most-used words in the news lexicon in recent years, has for the most part referred to the Hutarees as "militia members."

You probably see where Iím going here, but let me spell it out: Itís a safe bet that if "Hutaree" was instead coined to mean "the faithful bearded brotherhood of Allah," or something like that, itíd be a different story altogether.

Let me put it another way: The right-wing adage that all Muslims arenít terrorists, but all terrorists are Muslims might not be entirely accurate.

One manís terrorists

Or just let me ask this: Is it possible Muslim groups have a point when they complain they are singled out for unfair stereotyping in this country?

Now, at the risk of sounding smug, I wouldnít describe the Hutarees as terrorists, either.

But then I have never described anybody as a terrorist in any CBC report Iíve authored, for what I think is a very good reason: It spares you the tricky task of deciding who is a terrorist and who isnít.

Like most reporters at CBC, I tend to call bombers "bombers," and shooters "shooters," and people involved in political violence "extremists." Or "militants," depending on just how extreme they are.

Many of our readers and viewers donít like that policy and say so. They want to hear the word "terrorist." In fact, they sometimes seem to crave hearing it, or at least they do if the bad guyís cause, or his God, isnít theirs.

But once youíve bought into the word, youíve bought a problem. Such as: What to call the Hutarees?

What, for that matter, to call the loose affiliation of militant anti-abortion activists, some of whose supporters have killed doctors who perform these procedures?

Surely that qualifies as violence intended to advance a political agenda, which is the generally accepted definition of terrorism.

Or, what do you call those "civilian contractors" ó the Blackwater types ó who trampled around Iraq in the service of American diplomats, at times killing innocent locals, immune the whole time to Iraqi justice?

Or all the other murderous paramilitaries who have, over the years, been useful to the U.S. and countless other foreign powers?

The response is often that old chestnut about how one manís terrorist is another manís freedom fighter.

But that answer is the refuge of dull thinkers. "Freedom fighter" is just as useless a term as "terrorist." It means only what the user wants it to mean.

I should say here that the American media is not entirely un-self-aware. There has been some reflective discussion here along these lines of late.

National Public Radio had a segment on the subject the other night and the New York Times gave it a try in its Sunday edition.

But nowhere in the Times piece, which digressed into a scholarly history of the word "terrorist," was there any mention of how the Times had referred to the Hutarees ("militia members") in its news reports.

Because terrorists are always them. Never us.


Article from: CBC.ca



Related Articles
Could the Hutaree militia have spawned a Timothy McVeigh?
Hutaree - Wikipedia
How The FBI Got Inside The Hutaree Militia‎
War necessary, Hutaree leader says‎
Hutaree: Another Manís Freedom Fighter
Hutaree.com
American Injustice and Jose Padilla (2007 Video)


Latest News from our Front Page

Anglo-Saxon Sword and Helmet from Staffordshire Hoard Reconstructed
2015-05-29 0:49
Thousands of metal fragments from the Staffordshire Hoard have been reconstructed into two "significant" new 7th Century objects. Researchers have pieced together parts of a silver helmet and a previously unseen form of sword pommel. The hoard, which is valued at £3.2m, was found in a field near Burntwood, Staffordshire in July 2009. Both items have been put on display at Birmingham's Museum ...
ALEC corruption: Legislators and corporate lobbyists meet in secret at Savannah resort
2015-05-28 23:59
The Georgia Legislature has a message for voters: don't ask us about our meetings with corporate lobbyists behind closed doors. The 11Alive Investigators tracked lawmakers to a resort hotel in Savannah last week, where we observed state legislators and lobbyists mingling in the hotel bar the night before they gathered in private rooms to decide what new laws would best serve ...
Swedish politician: US is the true cause of the masses of refugees from the Middle East
2015-05-28 20:13
Editors Note: And who controls US foreign policy? Listen to Jeff Gates. The present Swedish debate about war refugees from the Middle East is an example of peer restricted expression. In the name of political correctness or perceived decency, any questioning of maximum generosity in opening Swedish borders for the refugees is indignantly rejected by the official mainstream. We have a ...
Even if Patriot Act Expires, Government Will Keep Spying on All Americans
2015-05-28 19:52
Government Will Use "Secret Interpretations" to Get Around Legal Prohibitions Mass surveillance under the Patriot Act is so awful that even its author says that the NSA has gone far beyond what the Act intended (and that the intelligence chiefs who said Americans aren't being spied on should be prosecuted for perjury). Specifically, the government is using a "secret interpretation" of the ...
The TPP, Monsanto, Rockefeller, Trilateral Commission, Brzezinski
2015-05-28 19:18
All hands on deck for global, economic, corporate dictatorship There are dots to connect here. They're real, and they're spectacular. Let me begin with a brief exchange from a 1978 interview, conducted by reporter Jeremiah Novak. He was speaking with two American members of the Trilateral Commission (TC), a group founded in 1973 by David Rockefeller and his intellectual flunkey, Zbigniew Brzezinski. NOVAK: ...
More News »